"Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much."

~ Helen Keller
 

Summer 2007

IN THIS ISSUE

Resolving Conflict
Email Etiquette


 

 

 

 

 




 

 

 

 

 

 




















The intent of this publication is to provide our clients, associates and suppliers with on-going support and fast, useful information focused on the leadership and team skills that are critical to business success. We hope you enjoy receiving Mentor and find something of value in each edition. However, the last thing we want to do is fill your inbox with unwanted information. So if you do not wish to receive this newsletter in the future simply follow the instructions at the bottom of the page and we will be happy to remove your name from our distribution list.
 
Clyde Dildine
Editor


Resolving Conflict

In our role as executive coaches we often see the item “Effectively deals with conflict situations” as one of the lower scoring items in a leader’s 360 feedback report. When we investigate the underlying reasons behind the ratings leaders typically acknowledge that they “deal” with conflict in one of several ways. When a conflict situation arises they tend to 1) withdraw and avoid it 2) agree and let the other person win 3) become defensive and work toward a win/lose outcome. Obviously, none of these are very effective approaches to dealing with conflict. Followers, colleagues and bosses want to see a leader take a proactive, constructive and collaborative approach to finding a resolution that is agreeable to both parties.   

Collaborative problem solving is the most effective way to deal with conflict. Yet it can be challenging to continually keep the discussion moving forward. To deal with conflict collaboratively, try the following process: 

1.       The first step is the toughest; someone must reach out to break a deadlock or make amends. This can be a risk but can have a tremendous impact on opening up communications and enabling people to work on a problem on which they have become entrenched. Ask to meet with the other person in a non-threatening place such as his or her office or a conference room.

2.       Begin the session with a statement defining the purpose of the meeting – something like, “Jim, I asked to meet with you today to discuss the disagreement you and I are having over the Fox contract. I want to work something out with you that we’re both comfortable with.”

3.       Actively listen to draw out information from the other person to fully understand their viewpoint and to help pinpoint the source of the disagreement. Listen with the intent to understand rather than debate, don’t interrupt. Then, state your thoughts in a non-defensive manner.

4.       When you have pinpointed the problem, together investigate alternative solutions. Remain nonjudgmental and search for as many solutions as possible.

5.       Together, evaluate the possibilities you’ve generated, listing pros and cons.  Remember, the goal is to work with the other party to find the best solution for both of you. Be prepared to comprise.

6.       Once you have evaluated the alternatives, commit to a solution with the other person.

7.       At this point, clearly state the solution and develop a plan to execute it. List the specific action steps, assign responsibility, and set specific completion dates for each step. It is important that the plan be specific and that each step is measurable and attainable.

8.       Develop a plan for future follow-up meetings or discussions to evaluate how things are going. Provide positive feedback on things that have helped resolve the conflict and identify any additional action steps required to completely resolve the issue.

Finally, remember that not all conflict spells trouble. Disagreements and diverse perspectives are needed for organizations to adapt to change and find solutions to challenging problems. When people can encourage different views, ideas and approaches in a non-combative way, conflict can:

  • Stimulate creativity and problem-solving
  • Foster teamwork and improve social relationships
  • Encourage listening
  • Promote reflective thinking and open communication
  • Yield information about people and situations
  • Signal that changes are necessary in relationships or the organization
  • Provide the means for expressing emotions, which can ultimately clear the air and reduce tension


 

 

Email Etiquette

While browsing Amazon.com’s Best Books So Far for 2007 I ran across an invaluable resource for anyone who uses email. According to Amazon, Send by David Shipley and Will Schwalbe, is the ultimate etiquette handbook for email. Full of practical insights, Send will help you "think before you click."

Publishers Weekly says: From this essential guidebook's opening sentence —"Bad things can happen on email"— Shipley and Schwalbe make all too clear what can go wrong. E-mail's ubiquity, with casual and formal correspondence jumbled in the same inbox, makes misunderstandings common; e-mail's inexpressive, text-only format doesn't help. Given its brief history, there's no established etiquette for usage, which is why this primer is so valuable. It promises the reader hope of becoming more efficient and less annoying, reducing danger of a career-ending blunder. Brisk, practical and witty, the book aims to improve the reader's skills as sender and recipient: devising effective subject lines and exploring "the politics of the cc"; how to steer clear of legal issues; and how to recognize different types of attachments. Using real-life examples from flame wars and awkward exchanges (including their own), Shipley and Schwalbe (op-ed editor of the New York Times and Hyperion Books' editor-in-chief) explain why people so often say "incredibly stupid things" in their outgoing messages. "Email has a tendency to encourage the lesser angels of our nature," they note. They also offer "seven big reasons to love email," along with quick guides to instant messaging and e-mail technology, all the while urging us to "think before [we] send."